<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: LabVIEW 2014 array constant change in LabVIEW</title>
    <link>https://ni.lithium.com/t5/LabVIEW/LabVIEW-2014-array-constant-change/m-p/2983845#M856493</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;It's rather subtle but makes you wonder why was the change even necessary. &amp;nbsp;Did someone request less of a difference? &amp;nbsp;Of course, some of us appear to be overly&amp;nbsp;"detail oriented" to have even noticed...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 18:17:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Inertia</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-09-08T18:17:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>LabVIEW 2014 array constant change</title>
      <link>https://ni.lithium.com/t5/LabVIEW/LabVIEW-2014-array-constant-change/m-p/2983789#M856482</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Why did the "graying out" of array constants change between LabVIEW 2014 and LabVIEW 2013? In 2014 the effect is much more subtle and it's far harder to tell the # of elements in an array constant. Please change this back ASAP!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://ip1.i.lithium.com/c478113dcf66f7d8ea734b66beb7bcf0e57f2148/68747470733a2f2f6e692e6c69746869756d2e636f6d2f74352f696d6167652f736572766572706167652f696d6167652d69642f31353335353569353744363431303039433743344333362f696d6167652d73697a652f6f726967696e616c3f763d6d70626c2d312670783d2d31" border="0" alt="array constants.png" title="array constants.png" align="center" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 17:40:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ni.lithium.com/t5/LabVIEW/LabVIEW-2014-array-constant-change/m-p/2983789#M856482</guid>
      <dc:creator>danielpalmer13</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-08T17:40:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LabVIEW 2014 array constant change</title>
      <link>https://ni.lithium.com/t5/LabVIEW/LabVIEW-2014-array-constant-change/m-p/2983831#M856491</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Haven't noticed it... But you are right! The 2013 implementation is much better and I agree that this change should be reverted.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;(Maybe the NI developers got facy new monitors which much wider gamut than the rest of us :D)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 18:07:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ni.lithium.com/t5/LabVIEW/LabVIEW-2014-array-constant-change/m-p/2983831#M856491</guid>
      <dc:creator>altenbach</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-08T18:07:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LabVIEW 2014 array constant change</title>
      <link>https://ni.lithium.com/t5/LabVIEW/LabVIEW-2014-array-constant-change/m-p/2983845#M856493</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It's rather subtle but makes you wonder why was the change even necessary. &amp;nbsp;Did someone request less of a difference? &amp;nbsp;Of course, some of us appear to be overly&amp;nbsp;"detail oriented" to have even noticed...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 18:17:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ni.lithium.com/t5/LabVIEW/LabVIEW-2014-array-constant-change/m-p/2983845#M856493</guid>
      <dc:creator>Inertia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-08T18:17:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LabVIEW 2014 array constant change</title>
      <link>https://ni.lithium.com/t5/LabVIEW/LabVIEW-2014-array-constant-change/m-p/2984195#M856523</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://ni.lithium.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/23522"&gt;@Inertia&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It's rather subtle but makes you wonder why was the change even necessary. &amp;nbsp;Did someone request less of a difference? &amp;nbsp;Of course, some of us appear to be overly&amp;nbsp;"detail oriented" to have even noticed...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;They had to justify a new version somehow...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Remember one of the "big five" new changes was the icon...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 20:58:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ni.lithium.com/t5/LabVIEW/LabVIEW-2014-array-constant-change/m-p/2984195#M856523</guid>
      <dc:creator>billko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-08T20:58:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LabVIEW 2014 array constant change</title>
      <link>https://ni.lithium.com/t5/LabVIEW/LabVIEW-2014-array-constant-change/m-p/2984619#M856597</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Same effect at the Diagram &amp;amp; Conditional Disable Structures!!! Agreed, please change back ASAP!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 08:27:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ni.lithium.com/t5/LabVIEW/LabVIEW-2014-array-constant-change/m-p/2984619#M856597</guid>
      <dc:creator>JensG69</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-09T08:27:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LabVIEW 2014 array constant change</title>
      <link>https://ni.lithium.com/t5/LabVIEW/LabVIEW-2014-array-constant-change/m-p/2984749#M856612</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;My only thought was that they tried to make the disabled elements more readable.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://ni.lithium.com/ni/attachments/ni/170/856612/1/Disabled%20Elements.PNG" border="0" alt="" title="" align="middle" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 11:07:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ni.lithium.com/t5/LabVIEW/LabVIEW-2014-array-constant-change/m-p/2984749#M856612</guid>
      <dc:creator>crossrulz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-09T11:07:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LabVIEW 2014 array constant change</title>
      <link>https://ni.lithium.com/t5/LabVIEW/LabVIEW-2014-array-constant-change/m-p/2985261#M856722</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://ni.lithium.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/75897"&gt;@crossrulz&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My only thought was that they tried to make the disabled elements more readable.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Then why change the empty element BOARDER?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 17:26:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ni.lithium.com/t5/LabVIEW/LabVIEW-2014-array-constant-change/m-p/2985261#M856722</guid>
      <dc:creator>JÞB</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-09T17:26:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LabVIEW 2014 array constant change</title>
      <link>https://ni.lithium.com/t5/LabVIEW/LabVIEW-2014-array-constant-change/m-p/2987785#M856982</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This was not an intentional change, CAR 492159 has been filed and is being investigated.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for reporting this,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Jeff Peacock&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Product Support Engineer | LabVIEW R&amp;amp;D | National Instruments | Certified LabVIEW Architect&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:23:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ni.lithium.com/t5/LabVIEW/LabVIEW-2014-array-constant-change/m-p/2987785#M856982</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jeff-P</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-10T15:23:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

