topic Re: time a complex number in BreakPoint

time a complex number

alfa1 — Wed, 16 Nov 2011 04:37:59 GMT

The Virtual Universe

“We are living in the same time in two universes: in a Real universe and in a Virtual universe” Adrian Ferent

An abstract of my theory on my blog: http://adrianferent.blogspot.com/

Re: time a complex number

alfa1 — Wed, 16 Nov 2011 21:46:27 GMT

Time: a complex number

Re: time a complex number

altenbach — Thu, 17 Nov 2011 23:52:49 GMT

> Time: a complex number

I agree, and right now it is 1.68196E-314 +2.17485E-242 i

Let's all meet at 1.68197E-314 +0 i tonight!

Re: time a complex number

smercurio_fc — Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:14:10 GMT

I thought the universe was just a big hologram, and therefore virtual, by definition.

Re: time a complex number

Darin.K — Wed, 16 Nov 2011 23:18:24 GMT

I know that Junior High School was a long time ago for many of us, but if you remember your Thermal Quantum Field Theory, then imaginary time is quite familiar to you.

Re: time a complex number

alfa1 — Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:44:45 GMT

No hologram, Virtual Universe my theory

Re: time a complex number

smercurio_fc — Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:49:57 GMT

Are you claiming copyright on the theory? Does this mean if I go an publish the idea in an accredited journal you will sue me?

Re: time a complex number

JÞB — Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:22:15 GMT

@alfa1 wrote:

The Virtual Universe

“We are living in the same time in two universes: in a Real universe and in a Virtual universe” Adrian Ferent

An abstract of my theory on my blog: http://adrianferent.blogspot.com/

What implications does this have on your earlier work showing the quantization of time as well as space? does the Plank constant need to be expanded to include other ,imagimary, dimentions or is it sufficient to abstract that sub-quantum increases can be expressed as mass?

Re: time a complex number

Ray.R — Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:11:52 GMT

Isn't that the theme behind "The Matrix"?

Re: time a complex number

Ben — Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:24:54 GMT

@alfa1 wrote:

Time: a complex number

Please tell us more.

If we do an anlysis of the unit for an FFT it turns out the units have a factor of "square root of a second" which was of interest to me since of the other relationships in physics like the area of a sphere is the derivative of the volume etc. But volume and area are terms that I have a gut feel for.

The square root of a second has me reaching for the duct-tape before long.

So if I play with the idea that time has a complex component then squaring the root second would mask the complex and give me a minus one multiplier which makes me wonder if we also have to sign wrong and time is really going backwards while we stand still making it look like we are moving forward.

I'm sure I got something wrong in that pile. I remeber sharing a bottle of whiskey with a freind once and deriving am equation that showed that God with infinate power could move anyhwre in zero time. We toasted the equation and then I figured out I had mixed-up big M with little m or something like that.

And all of that without once mentioning DST.

Ben

Re: time a complex number

smercurio_fc — Thu, 17 Nov 2011 23:48:58 GMT

@Ben wrote:

I'm sure I got something wrong in that pile. I remeber sharing a bottle of whiskey with a freind once and deriving am equation that showed that God with infinate power could move anyhwre in zero time. We toasted the equation and then I figured out I had mixed-up big M with little m or something like that

Well, it has been shown that Batman has an equation (and Wolfram Research's output), so God can't be too far off...

Re: time a complex number

alfa1 — Fri, 18 Nov 2011 18:33:15 GMT

The equation of time:

‘ t = t₀*((1 – a²)^1/2 + i*a) where: t₀ – is the absolute time; a = v / c ’ Adrian Ferent

Re: time a complex number

alfa1 — Mon, 21 Nov 2011 16:52:26 GMT

In Quantum mechanics my theory explains: " The amplitude of the wave is proportional with the speed of the particle: A =k*v " Adrian Ferent

Re: time a complex number

altenbach — Mon, 21 Nov 2011 16:56:40 GMT

What are the experiments and experimental results that back up your theory?

Re: time a complex number

alfa1 — Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:02:52 GMT

In Quantum mechanics my theory explains that: " The wavelength is inversely proportional to the momentum of a particle: λ = h / p " Adrian Ferent

My theory is confirmed by the de Broglie equations.

http://adrianferent.blogspot.com/

Re: time a complex number

smercurio_fc — Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:44:01 GMT

OK... the glee of having you back wearing down now. Can't you make a silly statement like "local variables are perfectly fine", or "LabVIEW is inflexible"? Even though these kinds of statements should simply be ignored, people insist on responding to them even though that's exactly what the poster wants - the poster simply wants to create conflict to get their kicks. So, come on, say something like that. I'm sure you'll light a fire under somebody's bu**. You're not creating conflict! Unless, of course, you happen to be a die-hard Newtonian physicist. Don't see too many of those on these boards.

Re: time a complex number

tbob — Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:38:15 GMT

Alfa 1:

I was once told by a psychic who can speak to the spirit world that aliens can visit this planet because they learned how to travel the enormous distances in very little time. They do so by folding space. Sort of like folding a page so that the distance between the top and bottom becomes very short. Can you explain how this is possible? If aliens from another planet can do it, why can't we? This is a serious question.

Another question. Is there an Alfa 2? This is not a serious question.

Re: time a complex number

alfa1 — Thu, 24 Nov 2011 18:00:26 GMT

My theory is not confirmed by the de Broglie equations at high speed, because de Broglie equations do not have anything to do with relativity.

The aliens can not travel the enormous distances in very little time.

Re: time a complex number

alfa1 — Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:20:01 GMT

My theory: the virtual mass is a negative mass and this is a proof for Dark energy.

Mass as a complex number in my theory:

m = mr + mi = m0( 1 / ( 1 – v^2 / c^2 )^1/2 + i( – v^2 / c^2 )^1/2 / ( 1 – v^2 / c^2 )^1/2)

mr – the real mass
mi – the virtual mass

Dark energy is a form of energy that permeates all of space and tends to accelerate the expansion of the universe (Nobel Prize this year).

An abstract of my theory on my blog: http://adrianferent.blogspot.com/

Re: time a complex number

smercurio_fc — Sat, 26 Nov 2011 04:17:13 GMT

I believe you need to reverse the polarity. That will fix it.