<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 2009.1? in BreakPoint</title>
    <link>https://ni.lithium.com/t5/BreakPoint/2009-1/m-p/979014#M8441</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;nrp wrote: &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any guesses what the next point release version number of LV2009 is going to be?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2009.1?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here's hoping the new boolean constant makes it into this version &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt; I prefere &lt;EM&gt;bug-free&lt;/EM&gt; over &lt;EM&gt;feature rich&lt;/EM&gt; over &lt;EM&gt;nice&lt;/EM&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And R&amp;amp;D isn't officially evaluating any of the LabVIEW idea Exchange ideas.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ton &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 18:35:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TCPlomp</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-09-05T18:35:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>2009.1?</title>
      <link>https://ni.lithium.com/t5/BreakPoint/2009-1/m-p/979009#M8440</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Any guesses what the next point release version number of LV2009 is going to be?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2009.1?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here's hoping the new boolean constant makes it into this version &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 18:08:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ni.lithium.com/t5/BreakPoint/2009-1/m-p/979009#M8440</guid>
      <dc:creator>Neil.Pate</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-05T18:08:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2009.1?</title>
      <link>https://ni.lithium.com/t5/BreakPoint/2009-1/m-p/979014#M8441</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;nrp wrote: &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any guesses what the next point release version number of LV2009 is going to be?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2009.1?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here's hoping the new boolean constant makes it into this version &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt; I prefere &lt;EM&gt;bug-free&lt;/EM&gt; over &lt;EM&gt;feature rich&lt;/EM&gt; over &lt;EM&gt;nice&lt;/EM&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And R&amp;amp;D isn't officially evaluating any of the LabVIEW idea Exchange ideas.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ton &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 18:35:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ni.lithium.com/t5/BreakPoint/2009-1/m-p/979014#M8441</guid>
      <dc:creator>TCPlomp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-05T18:35:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2009.1?</title>
      <link>https://ni.lithium.com/t5/BreakPoint/2009-1/m-p/979020#M8442</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm sorry, just looked up the stats.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The boolean redesign is the only one listed not 'new'.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However I feel pity in that, the boolean redesign (how nice the idea actually is) is a top priority on the R&amp;amp;D to-do list.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;First get all the bugs fixed (and not only the ones in the 'known issues' list).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;rant&amp;gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have seen bugs (which affects us and our costumers) dropped of the known issues list for no apparent reason.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have seen bugs being 'deferred' while the actual work of code should be limited.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;/rant&amp;gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ton &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 20:01:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ni.lithium.com/t5/BreakPoint/2009-1/m-p/979020#M8442</guid>
      <dc:creator>TCPlomp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-05T20:01:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2009.1?</title>
      <link>https://ni.lithium.com/t5/BreakPoint/2009-1/m-p/979029#M8444</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You are right, they should probably save the boolean redesign for the 2010 release to give the Marketing team something to work with!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I suppose though its like in any project, adding new features is often more &lt;EM&gt;fun&lt;/EM&gt; than fixing boring bugs! &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 22:02:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ni.lithium.com/t5/BreakPoint/2009-1/m-p/979029#M8444</guid>
      <dc:creator>Neil.Pate</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-05T22:02:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

