09-20-2018 07:58 AM
Hello,
I have a application running very well and I was wondering in an UPGRADE to myRIO-1900, since it is based on FPGA and has wireless connection.
The basic validation was configure acquisition rate and number os samples, and it seemed not to be so straightforward (https://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/How-to-fft-the-myRIO-accelorometer-readings/td-p/3317681), the applications used in community are slow for medium frequency acquisition and not scalable.
Did I put too much credit believing that a myRIO device could make a simple acquisition and FFT transform? Is it not the correct device to embedded signal analysis, should I look for an arduino application more useful?
Hope you can help me with this issue, I still believe that this application can come true
Best Regards,
09-25-2018
04:19 PM
- last edited on
01-10-2025
05:32 PM
by
Content Cleaner
Hey mbriago,
I am not sure what "medium frequency acquisition" and "not scalable" means to you, so I can't give you an answer righ off the bat. On the other hand, I can definetly say that a myRIO can have a better performance for Data Acquisition and FFT than Arduino.
Comparing Sampling Rates
Comparing Processing.
Questions
Below is a couple of links that may help you get what you need.
Analog Input Express VI
https://www.ni.com/docs/en-US/bundle/labview-myrio-toolkit/page/myrioreference/myrioref_exp_ai.html
Required and Optional Software to Program NI myRIO (see the part explaining how you can directly programm myRIO's FPGA)
https://www.ni.com/en/support/documentation/supplemental/13/required-and-optional-software-to-progra...
Sincerely,