Random Posts (An alternate to side discussions)

[SteveChandler]

Bacon - Candy for the carnivore!

[JW-JnJ]

Bacon, it has class

(ba-dum-ching.... groan)

[crossrulz]

---

@Steve Chandler wrote:

Bacon - Candy for the carnivore!

---

My wife doesn't get us bacon much because I will literally just sit there and each the whole pack (that has been cooked) until she stops me.  It's like eating chips to me.

[SteveChandler]

Bacon comes from pigs which are clearly more evolved. My therory is proven by the equation below.

It is further illustrated in the image below.

I'm not too sure what this next image illustrates but it must have something to do with bacon.

[crossrulz]

---

@Steve Chandler wrote:

Bacon comes from pigs which are clearly more evolved. My therory is proven by the equation below.

It is further illustrated in the image below.

---

A shame I can only give 1 kudos for a post...

[SnowMule]

[alfa1]

The most important result of my equation is: we have more than 1 life, this means reincarnation, Evolution!

This thing is not easy to be accepted by the Christians, the Muslims, the Jews, the Atheists … who say we have 1 life, who were brainwashed by their stupid parents, stupid grandparents, stupid professors, stupid clerics…

For example the Greek mythology is the body of myths and legends, but the difficult part is they were building big temples, a huge price for their stupidity, stupidity transferred by parents to children, by professors to students…

My proof is a mathematical proof!

http://a3.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/c0.0.290.290/p403x403/523695_391980067531539_26122264...

An abstract of my theory Consciousness and Evolution on my blog:
http://adrianferent.blogspot.com/

[Hornless.Rhino]

---

@alfa1 wrote:

C = c(e^(2x / 5000) – 1)

---

Why would this not be reduced to

C=ce^(x/2500)-1  ?

[jcarmody]

---

@Hornless.Rhino wrote:

---

@alfa1 wrote:

C = c(e^(2x / 5000) – 1)

---

Why would this not be reduced to

C=ce^(x/2500)-1  ?

---

Clearly, it's because the 2x term represents the alfa1 stupidity factor (1/(stupid parents) + 2/(stupid grandparents) + 3/(stupid professors) + 4/(stupid clerics) ... +n/(stupid alfa1)).  While it is the same mathematically, the equation is not as elegant your way.  The answer is still the same, but alfa1's stupidity is obfuscated.