BreakPoint

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Rube Goldberg Code

Hmm, I wonder if this could be simplified. (seen here)

 

altenbach_0-1681608801412.png

 

Message 2501 of 2,635
(3,956 Views)

@Jacobson-ni wrote:

The 2D array is just a constant after the first value right?


Yes, it'll be [[20],[15]] since the lower loops always gives 1 element out.

G# - Award winning reference based OOP for LV, for free! - Qestit VIPM GitHub

Qestit Systems
Certified-LabVIEW-Developer
0 Kudos
Message 2502 of 2,635
(3,861 Views)

This

AeroSoul_0-1683714730136.png

 

from here.

 

Also he only posted a picture, not actual code.

Message 2503 of 2,635
(3,735 Views)

Inception fan haha

 

What are these actually? Never seen these type of data before

VinnyAstro_0-1683719321716.png

 

0 Kudos
Message 2504 of 2,635
(3,721 Views)

@VinnyAstro wrote:

Inception fan haha

 

What are these actually? Never seen these type of data before

VinnyAstro_0-1683719321716.png

 


That is the old look for a Local Variable.  I'd have to do some digging to figure out when the look changed.  I'm thinking it was in the 2012-2014 time frame.

 

EDIT:  Wow, the redesign is older than I thought: 2010.



There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines
"Not that we are sufficient in ourselves to claim anything as coming from us, but our sufficiency is from God" - 2 Corinthians 3:5
Message 2505 of 2,635
(3,708 Views)

@crossrulz wrote:

EDIT:  Wow, the redesign is older than I thought: 2010.


Found that in the other comments.

VinnyAstro_0-1683722442562.png

Still hard working on it apparently haha

0 Kudos
Message 2506 of 2,635
(3,694 Views)

@VinnyAstro wrote:

Inception fan haha

 

What are these actually? Never seen these type of data before

VinnyAstro_0-1683719321716.png

 


As has been mentioned, you have to thank me for that. Similarly, look at the old rectangular boolean constant! 😄

 

altenbach_0-1683729084147.png

 

This code is very old, but not prehistoric. For example LabVIEW 4 only had "continue if true" stop conditions but here we have a "stop if true". Stacked sequences were quite popular because the screen resolution was so low (e.g. 640x480, 800x600, 1024x768).

The absolute worst part of stacked sequences were the "sequence locals"., forcing unnatural wire directions.

 

Message 2507 of 2,635
(3,674 Views)

@VinnyAstro wrote:

Inception fan haha

 

What are these actually? Never seen these type of data before

VinnyAstro_0-1683719321716.png

 


Heh, i didn't react to that at all. Probably because that was the look when i started using LV and i've used few since they changed the looks. 🙂

G# - Award winning reference based OOP for LV, for free! - Qestit VIPM GitHub

Qestit Systems
Certified-LabVIEW-Developer
Message 2508 of 2,635
(3,656 Views)

@altenbach wrote:

This code is very old, but not prehistoric. For example LabVIEW 4 only had "continue if true" stop conditions but here we have a "stop if true". Stacked sequences were quite popular because the screen resolution was so low (e.g. 640x480, 800x600, 1024x768).


We can't see any error wires, but i'd assume it's the yellow one and not the older pink ones.

 

I have a feeling it's LV7 or 8, upgraded from earlier versions.

G# - Award winning reference based OOP for LV, for free! - Qestit VIPM GitHub

Qestit Systems
Certified-LabVIEW-Developer
0 Kudos
Message 2509 of 2,635
(3,612 Views)

@altenbach wrote:
As has been mentioned, you have to thank me for that. Similarly, look at the old rectangular boolean constant

I was always confused how people were putting these on their block diagram !!!

Yes the array example you provide makes a lot of sense actually.

 

0 Kudos
Message 2510 of 2,635
(3,605 Views)