03-30-2007
02:32 AM
- last edited on
05-19-2025
10:18 AM
by
Content Cleaner
03-30-2007 08:24 AM
04-02-2007
11:35 AM
- last edited on
05-19-2025
10:18 AM
by
Content Cleaner
InternationAL,
I'm currently looking into the problem with this missing GPI DLL and will post on this forum as soon as I find where this DLL is located. You can create DLLs using the GPI Wizard. This requires Visual Studio C++ 6.0 since this is what GPI technology is built on. Since you have 10.1, unless you like using C++ (GPI is not the easiest to program for), you have many other options for using your code in DIAdem. As far as the documentation for provided GPI DLLs, I will also post back here as soon as I am able to find this documentation
04-02-2007 11:41 AM
04-02-2007 11:46 AM
04-03-2007 01:06 AM
Hello Brandon!
What you say is not completly right. The GPI can also be used with Delphi (Pascal). The interface files can be found in the GPI documentation directory. It is a little more work because there is no wizard available. We developed a class wrapper wich makes it easy to use. In general every programming language wich is able to export standard C functions can be used.
Matthias
Matthias Alleweldt Project Engineer / Projektingenieur | Twigeater? |
04-03-2007 07:02 AM
04-03-2007 07:33 AM
Matthias Alleweldt Project Engineer / Projektingenieur | Twigeater? |
04-03-2007 08:20 AM
So, are you the proud owners of the missing DLL mentioned in the article? Do you have a copy?
It seems like the DIAdem GUI might be "manipulated" by adding these floating palettes. It would be the closest thing to adding a toolbar, I guess, and would be what I am after. I want to implement a non-modal dialog. If I could get that floating palette to work, I would be happy.
If it is not too much trouble, I would be interested in the list of features implemented by you in a GPI extension that is not "outdated". In other words, here is the list of things we do that can only be done via a GPI extension, and here is a list of things we could do with a GPI extension, as well. That way, I could figure out if I need to pursue this very far, or not. It wouldn't have to be an exhaustive list, either. Just a top five of the things you sure are glad you have GPI extensions for. Then I could figure out whether I need to learn this or not.
If something can today be done in script, or via some other more documented means, than learning GPI extensions wouldn't be motivated by that.
Is everything you listed only doable with GPI extensions? I guess not, since you said some of the items are "outdated".
Thank you so much for all the information you have provided. I appreciate it.
04-03-2007 10:23 AM