11-02-2007 06:45 PM
11-02-2007 08:34 PM
I noticed some changes.
Interesting stats page. I'll have to explore the other changes.
Thanks Laura!
11-02-2007 11:59 PM
Hi Joe,
So, you celebrated the Halloween & changed back your logo to your older self... ?!
I thought the doctor was on vacasion. Somehow, I get the impression that your logo resembles a doc, thats why...
11-03-2007 01:06 AM
11-03-2007 09:37 AM
Hi Laura,
And the next change will fix the rating system (I hope).
It looks like the change introduced two new bugs!
1) See this thread where CC (
) posted triplets of emoticons.
While the emoticons all show, the link to the image of one of the three is missing in all his posting!
2) The reply number are now numbered backwards!
We often reply to Q's in the form " Please see reply #X in this thread.
ALL of those number are now wrong!
I concider that a serious bug.
and BTW
Silly me, I did not think anyone other than Dennis and Christian posted on the week-end.
Ben
11-03-2007 10:02 AM
Regarding the new look of our profile.
Could you put the link for "Find all posts by this user" at the top?
That is the primary reason I visit my profile (aside from admiring my star count )
Could you sneak that small change in?
Please.......
Ben
11-03-2007 10:16 AM
OK, ignore my previous about "post by..."
Its a wrapping issue. If I size the window larger the link is viewable without scrolling to the bottom.
Ben
11-03-2007 10:24 AM
Another bug.
WHen I rate an answer, the stars don't show up in left pane under icon.
The star count for the individual increments but the thread does not show the stars.
The option to re-rate the post is gone.
Just no stars!
Ben
11-03-2007 10:36 AM
More observations about star bug.
after about five minutes I am allowed to re-rate the posts. On the second attempt the stars do show up.
So maybe you should NOT fix this bug since it gives us the chance to double rate posts.
Ben
11-03-2007 10:44 AM - edited 11-03-2007 10:46 AM
RE numbering bug
See this search for examples that use post #'s
This bug renders the bulk of thoes replies uesless.
Ben