07-20-2008 08:58 AM
Hi Laura,
Lets start simple.
Please post a date by which this on-going problem will be fixed.
It is a shame that my longest thread is this one.
Ben
07-20-2008 09:09 AM
I know this has been proposed before, but here goes again:
What if the rating system didn't do an overall average of stars, but rather a skewed method where the newest rating places weight on the last average. That way, you do not need 8 ratings to offset a single 1 star rating.
example:
1 star = 1
5 star = 3
5 star = 4
5 star = 5
🙂
07-20-2008 10:03 AM
Let's stay focused.
Please Laura,
Please post a date when this will be fixed.
Please, please please please please.
Ben
07-21-2008 02:56 AM
Please Laura,
Please post a date when this will be fixed.
Please, please please please please.
07-21-2008 06:14 AM
07-21-2008 10:00 AM
07-21-2008 10:20 AM
Excellent!
That is a report of progress which is more than I asked. Please keep us posted if delays are encountered and please let us know if we can help with beta testing prior to the final release.
Thank you,
Ben
07-21-2008 10:37 PM
Laura F. wrote:
While I cannot say when to expect the upgrade, as you can see it is soon and I am actively working on it.
07-22-2008 01:35 AM
07-22-2008 01:37 AM
Joe Wrote:
I know this has been proposed before, but here goes again:
What if the rating system didn't do an overall average of stars, but rather a skewed method where the newest rating places weight on the last average. That way, you do not need 8 ratings to offset a single 1 star rating.
example:
1 star = 1
5 star = 3
5 star = 4
5 star = 5