02-22-2008 01:09 PM
03-03-2008 02:26 AM
03-03-2008 08:00 AM
The ridiculous values were either excessively small or excessively high (they look unscaled, or doubly scaled).
I eventually figured out the channel operation by just going around and unplugging my sensors, so the problem was solved, albeit in an ugly manner. The pattern I noticed (I think this is correct) is that if you include channels 1,3,5,6,11,15 for example, they will be indexed 0-5 in ascending original-channel-number order.
03-04-2008 06:22 PM
03-07-2008 07:08 AM