Instrument Control (GPIB, Serial, VISA, IVI)

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Time and self-calibration problems with PCIe-Card 6321 in association with a USB-controlled detector from Roper Scientific

Hello,

 

I have a hardware/software problem (still don't know what it is) with the PCIe-card 6321 in assocaiation with an photodiode array (PDA) OMA-V detector from Roper Scientific. The PDA is controlled over USB 2.0 with a ST-133 controller. I use the NI DAQmx device-driver 9.2.1 and PVCam 2.7.6 for PDA and ST-133 controller and the libraries come along with them on a unpatched Windows XP SP3 system using Microsofts Visual C++ 6 Pro.

 

Before every measurement I make a check of the speed of the PDA and the 6321-card. Therefore I use for the digital i/o ports this code:

 

 

for(i=0;i<1000;i++)
    {
        DAQmxReadDigitalLines (m_MIOtaskHandleRead,1,10.0,DAQmx_Val_GroupByChannel,Rdata,1,&read,&bytesPerSamp,NULL);
    }

 

for the analog input ports:

DAQmxCreateTask("",&taskHandleSE);
DAQmxCreateAIVoltageChan(taskHandleSE,"Dev1/ai0","",DAQmx_Val_Diff,0.0,10.0,DAQmx_Val_Volts,NULL);
DAQmxCfgSampClkTiming(taskHandleSE,"",250000.0,DAQmx_Val_Rising,DAQmx_Val_FiniteSamps,80);
	
QueryPerformanceCounter((LARGE_INTEGER*)&g_FirstCount);  //Counter to get Time

for (ix=0;ix<100;ix++)
{
	DAQmxStartTask(taskHandleSE);
	DAQmxReadAnalogF64(taskHandleSE,Interval,10.0,DAQmx_Val_GroupByChannel,SEdata,Interval,&rrread,NULL);
	DAQmxStopTask(taskHandleSE);
	temp=0;
	for (i=0;i<Interval;i++) temp=temp+SEdata[i];  //Interval=40 // stuff to 
	temp=(float64)(temp/float64(Interval));
} 
	
	QueryPerformanceCounter((LARGE_INTEGER*)&g_LastCount); //Counter to get Time
	DAQmxClearTask(taskHandleSE);

 

 

and for the PDA I take 100 spectra. The programm then gives me the average times for each test. Most of all I got too slow times for the analog input and the PDA test.

But after making a self-calibration with the Measurement & Automation Explorer from NI for the 6321 card I got 3-4 times faster/better values for the analog input and good values for the PDA. But it's not the only thing which is strange. Making the time check only for the PDA (6321-card is unplugged) I got zigzag-patterns in measurement durations. When then 6321-card is plugged in the zigzag-patterns disappear, but the single measurement times can vary considerably. The measurement durations for the PDA drop below the value of the presetted exposure time and stay stable at this level --> this simply makes no sense.

 

So, my questions are:

 

  • Could there be a problem in programming? Do you know from problems using the PVCam libraries in connection with libraries from NI?
  • Can I get in trouble receiving data from PCIe-card and data from the PDA via USB 2.0 using the same mainboard?
  • Are there driver problems, so that one gets in the way of the other one?

I'm still searching for the origin on the problems, and will be thankful for any hint.

0 Kudos
Message 1 of 2
(3,228 Views)

Hi torsten.schwarz,

 

it seems like a problem with both devices and it's helpful separate the problems.

Remove the PCIe Card or the Camera and first make sure the single problem can separate and solved. any problems with your PDA please contact Roper Scientific.

 

If you worry about your programming please read following links:

 

"Programming NI-DAQ in Text-Based Languages"

<http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/websearch/8715FD7608B79AFC86256ECA004B87F1?OpenDocument>


"Programming NI-DAQ in Visual C++ 6.0!

<http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/websearch/0087C1E20920F7B986256D9B0061DEE2?OpenDocument>

 

In my Opinion the Code looks workable. Now to your Questions:

 

  • Do you know from problems using the PVCam libraries in connection with libraries from NI?
  • -> We don't know about any issues
  • Can I get in trouble receiving data from PCIe-card and data from the PDA via USB 2.0 using the same mainboard?
  • -> I think not
  • Are there driver problems, so that one gets in the way of the other one?
  • -> We don't know about any issues
0 Kudos
Message 2 of 2
(3,189 Views)