Configure values to the functions

[P@Anand]

Adding an option of configuring values to the functions like comparison, calculation will make the things much easier.

I Understand that this will be having limited use only as we can use this only when we are comparing the value with the predefined value but it still make sense for me to post it and I will add kudos if it has already posted.

1. The code looks simple

2. Save the use of Numeric memory

[AristosQueue (NI)]

> 2. Save the use of Numeric memory

How would it do that?

[P@Anand]

The function itself will hold it. 🙂 (forgot to add the line)

[AristosQueue (NI)]

That's not going to improve performance or decrease memory -- I can't see any reason why the compiler would produce anything different than it does in current LV versions.

[P@Anand]

I haven't mentioned that it will increase the performance. Its simple if "able to compare with zero why not with other numbers"

[RavensFan]

Comparing with zero is not any different in performance compared to comparing with any other number.  The only thing it does is require one less node on the block diagram.

I just don't see the need to complicate one simple and frequently used function with configuration options.

[tst]

What would the primitive look like if I ask it to compare to -3425361?

[Darin.K]

I would be much more inclined to ditch the =<>0 comparisons to reduce palette weight.

[RavensFan]

I wouldn't eliminate the =<>0 functions.  As I said they are frequently used.  The space on the palette is justtified for them.

[Darren]

Any idea that has received less than 2 kudos within 2 years after posting will be automatically declined.