User | Kudos |
---|---|
13 | |
11 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
To my surprise there's no type specifier on the In Place Get/Replace Variant Attribute.
I post it as an idea even if I'm sure there's a good explanation about it. I would find it convenient if the Get Attribute type would match the one Set.
Is it because the new value could be of any other type? At least on the left side, if we could just specify the type as the regular Get Attribute it would be nice.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.