04-11-2006 05:46 PM
04-12-2006 03:33 PM
04-12-2006 04:14 PM
Grant
thank you for the suggestion, i will attempt that but i have more questions based on this.
1. is there a way to define a different working directory so i dont have to be path specific in all my files?
2. If the sub that is being called by the routine in the node calls additional subs, would the path have to be defined in every sub, or dose math script remember the path and not revert to default for calls from the subs? ( I hope that isn't to confusing 🙂 )
3. which method is more efficient in mathscript. to use function calls outside of the node (multiple sub routines) or to move those subs up into the node, so that the node is one long script with outside function calls?
Thanks again for the help
chris
04-13-2006 10:43 AM
04-13-2006 10:59 AM
04-14-2006 08:46 AM - edited 04-14-2006 08:46 AM
Message Edited by GrantM on 04-14-2006 08:47 AM
04-14-2006 04:27 PM
Thank you for the thorough answer, the code was originally written in Japan, and there were a lot of japanese comments in it. I thought I removed all but I may have missed a couple, seems like that is the obvious start. There are also quite a few if loops, this being a filtering and normalization routine. I would never have thought of checking how deep the nests are...
and i like the code halving approach that sounds like quite a time saver.
Thanks again...I will let you know how it turns out
Chris
04-24-2006 10:05 AM
04-24-2006 12:06 PM
04-24-2006 05:48 PM