LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Averaging of each element of array

Solved!
Go to solution

@JÞB wrote:

My take is "Mean means Mean."  There is nothing to stop you from using a PtbyPt filter if a filter is needed other than the filter vi would also need to be revised to handle an array input as well.


Nothing stops me from using PtByPt filters, except my own common sense 😝.

 

I make my classes so they instantiate objects that always work, even when used in other objects, in arrays, maps, etc..

 

PtByPt just don't allow me to do that. Unless of course I'd open Vi references to newly instantiated clones, but that's far from perfect as well.

0 Kudos
Message 31 of 33
(670 Views)

I could agree that the PfbyPt.lvlib would benefit from an update.


"Should be" isn't "Is" -Jay
Message 32 of 33
(660 Views)

@JÞB wrote:

I could agree that the PfbyPt.lvlib would benefit from an update.


I think for most users, the PtByPt is great. But once you scale up (more threads, more objects, more testing) they become counter productive.

 

I have converted some to PtByPt VIs myself.

 

Sadly, they're not the most structured code I've seen. Not all the way down south, but down the equator. And a lot for them use nested PtByPt, which would require an 'all or nothing' approach.

 

Message 33 of 33
(637 Views)