Greg:
When I ran a test on the method I used with the low-level File I/O
functions to verify my reply to the original post, reading the datalog
file failed unless I put the U16 in the time stamp cluster first.
I just ran a test on the database method you recommend and also on the
low-level method (using the exact same datalog file I used yesterday)
and it seems the time-stamp cluster is in the opposite order and indeed
the U32 comes first, exactly as described in the manual. Any ideas on
why the read datalog would have failed? Did I just do something stupid?
My apologies again to the group. The cluster for the time stamp is:
element 0 = U32
element 1 = U16
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest
way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!