03-12-2008 05:33 AM
03-12-2008
06:05 AM
- last edited on
11-07-2024
01:57 PM
by
Content Cleaner
Hi,
The analog filter has a ripple rate in the pass-band, while the digital filter is perfectly flat. The flatness achievable with analog filters is limited by the accuracy of their resistors and capacitors. Even if a Butterworth response is designed (i.e., 0% ripple), filters of this complexity will have a residue ripple. On the other hand, the flatness of digital filters is primarily limited by round-off error, making them hundreds of times flatter than their analog counterparts. The digital filter is clearly the victor in both roll-off and stop-band attenuation. Even if the analog performance is improved by adding additional stages, it still can't compare to the digital filter. The digital filter's step response is symmetrical between the lower and upper portions of the step, i.e., it has a linear phase. The analog filter's step response is not symmetrical, i.e., it has a nonlinear phase.
There are still many applications where analog filters should, or must, be used. This is not related to the actual performance of the filter (i.e., what goes in and what comes out), but to the general advantages that analog circuits have over digital techniques. The first advantage is speed: digital is slow; analog is fast. The second advantage of analog over digital is dynamic range. Amplitude dynamic range is the ratio between the largest signal that can be passed through a system, and the inherent noise of the system. And the last flavor is frequency dynamic range.
In the links below you have more information about the digital filters in LabVIEW:
03-12-2008 06:27 AM
03-12-2008 08:46 AM
Hi,
Normally you have all functions what you need on the sub-palette ‘Signal Processing’. Let try to program and let me know if you have what you want. If you have some problem, do not hesitate to come here again and don’t forget to attach you Vis.
03-13-2008 01:23 AM