I am trying to use Shared Variables in Labview 8.5 to enable real-time loops (similar to some of the examples in "Using the LabVIEW Shared Variable", published Aug 28, 2007). I created it to hold the result of a 16-channel A/D converter (so a 16-element I16 array). To avoid losing samples, I used buffering, with a buffer of 5. To test this, I made a pair of VIs, one a producer that stuffs a 16-element I16 array into the shared variable "every so often" (controlled by a timed loop), and a consumer loop that reads the shared variable and does something with the data.
If I think of the buffered shared variable as a Real Time FIFO (as the article suggests it is), I was curious how I would know (a) when the queue was empty, and (b) if the queue had overflowed. Both are necessary if this is to be a practical means of exchanging data -- you want the producer and consumer to run more-or-less at the same rate, but only the producer is deterministic. The consumer needs to be able to run "faster" if it falls behind (for example, because it is writing data to disk), but you don't want it to read data from the shared variable if there's nothing there. [One can always read a shared variable, after all -- as the article states, it simply "holds" the last value written to it].
Snooping around, I discovered that there are "error codes" associated with the shared variable. In particular, a code of -2220 (FFFFF754) seems to signify an empty queue (or a shared variable that has not yet been written to), while a code of -1950678981 (8BBB003B) appears to be "buffer overflow".
Is this documented anywhere? Are there other "error codes" that would be helpful to know? Is there some rationale to these seemingly-random numbers? [It would help to develop code to utilize shared variables if there was a bit less "magic" and "mystery" involved].
For what it is worth, with a buffer of size 40, I could generate 16 I16 values at 1 KHz (simulating sampling from a 16-channel A/D at 1 KHz) and pass it to a consumer node that (a) read from the shared variable until it was empty, then (b) "went to sleep" for 20 msec (simulating "doing something else non-deterministically"), and not miss any data (because I could then empty the Shared Variable RT-FIFO, which should have been half full, before it overflowed on me). Not bad throughput -- I bet I could push it even higher.
Bob Schor
