10-24-2013 04:44 PM
@Yamaeda wrote:
Impressive, i didn't think it'd differ that much, ~20ms to 4,5. By separating your loop to 3 i shaved off yet some to ~3,5ms.
/Y
... probably because each loop runs on a different CPU in parallel. 😄
10-24-2013 05:00 PM
Yes ofcourse, that's why i separated them, but as we know not everything do always benefit from parallellization. But your replace loop vs my simple for-loop was a factor 5. Still, feels good to improve on an Altenbach. ;D
/Y