09-24-2007 12:52 PM
09-24-2007 01:00 PM
09-24-2007 01:15 PM
09-24-2007 01:25 PM
09-24-2007 01:32 PM
09-24-2007 01:34 PM
Hello Flamming
i acknowledge the problem. it occurs as well when the events have " value change" instead of "mouse up" (preferable btw).
Altough not cleary written in the caveats for using events, i think this behavior is not a bug. the reason is that all the structures must recieve all the events, even the ones not treated for. in other words, the two loops recieve the event queue, even if the second loop still waits on another value (in your case the boolean).
we might need a confirmation on that though.
in the mean time, why even think of using two separated event structures? surely you can design your application to work with a single structure 🙂
09-24-2007 01:36 PM
09-24-2007 01:36 PM
Hi Dennis,
i was just looking into the caveats, and i cant find there a clear "dont do" on that, atough it could clearly lead to problems, as here.
09-24-2007 02:15 PM - edited 09-24-2007 02:15 PM
Message Edited by Flaming Moe on 09-24-2007 02:16 PM