06-02-2006 01:37 PM
06-02-2006 01:39 PM - edited 06-02-2006 01:39 PM
Message Edited by m3nth on 06-02-2006 01:44 PM
06-02-2006 08:36 PM - edited 06-02-2006 08:36 PM
Message Edited by m3nth on 06-02-2006 08:37 PM
06-03-2006 12:46 AM
The sender VI writes to the first shared variable, which is never read anywhere.
The receiver VI reads the second shared variable, which never receives any data from anywhere.
This just does not make a lot of sense. Don't you want to read and write using the same shared variable? 🙂 OK, let's use a single variable in both locations.
---> I agree there is something wrong with the chart update if that weird "status subVI" is inside the receiver loop. Very strange. I agree this must be a bug... (I don't quite see the purpose of that subVI, though).
Did you notice that deleting that brown empty cluster and its useless shift register in the receiver ALSO fixes the chart update problem? 🙂 (even with status subVI remaining in the loop).
06-06-2006 11:43 AM
06-06-2006 11:59 AM
06-07-2006 12:10 PM
06-07-2006 12:32 PM
06-07-2006 01:53 PM
06-07-2006 02:01 PM