Hi Greg,
On a related note I would like to ask you a question.
I wrote an app. in 6.0.1 that took advantage of the defer panel updates option (that I learned about from you, thank you). I was very pleased with the effects.
Since then, I have taked the same piece of code and have started to use it in another app that I am developing now in 6.1. I no longer see any performance differences using the defer scheme like I had seen earlier. Are the charts failing to "honor" the deferments in 6.1?
Before you mentioned the table thing (above), I was just thinking that the charts have been updated such that the deferment does not make things any more efficient.
So...
Are the charts just faster now?
or
Are the charts not honoring...?
or
Is Ben just confused (it would not be the first time)?
Ben
PS On a general note: You are legendary here at Data Science Automation. I have learned alot from your posting. Thank you.