Well, let me try to explain something, which can be really questionable
😉Hence both methods use the same API, the DAQmx API, they have different "implementations". The LV API consist of LV VIs, of course, in the first instance. Of course, digging deep into them, you will encouder CLFNs to the DAQmx DLLs. But some of them are "hidden" because property nodes are in fact something similar to the DLL-calls......
In MAX, you never "see" the API, you are using the wizard. Nevertheless, MAX uses the internal functions contained within the wizard to use the device just as desired (hopefully
🙂 ) But it never will use the VIs to accomplish that...
Now there are imho two possibilities for you:
a) You start using the LV DAQ Assistent to create your tasks on the PC. It has the same appearence as the wizard in MAX, so you will not trade any used interface for a new one (which would be the API). When you finished the definition, the wizard can be transferred to LV code which can be altered. But if doing this, you will lose the possibility to alter the task using the "used API", the wizard.
b) You can live with the current situation but create a product suggestion for LV and DAQ at
the Product Suggestion Center.
hope this helps,
Norbert
Norbert
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CEO: What exactly is stopping us from doing this?
Expert: Geometry
Marketing Manager: Just ignore it.