11-26-2012 06:58 PM - edited 11-26-2012 06:59 PM
Here's the interpretation I was describing. I used the OpenG random number. But you can recreate that code easily enough.

11-26-2012 08:06 PM
oh...i see....ok but I'm still not getting the range for each row 😞
11-26-2012 08:19 PM
If you see, then you should have it.
If you don't have it, then post the latest version of your code.
11-26-2012 09:00 PM
I only have the 2D random numbers working for now....I need to have the ranging work for each row in the array
11-26-2012 09:12 PM
Show us the VI!
You can't say something doesn't work and expect help if you don't show us what you are doing.
If you followed Jeff's code, you would have it. You posted a snapshot of code that was ALMOST like Jeff's code, but had one small mistake in it: a basic math error.
11-26-2012 09:33 PM
I've tried Jeff's code in the attachment
11-26-2012 10:15 PM
There is absolutely no way you could have gotten the 2-D array you've shown with the code you've posted.
I said to post a VI, not a screenshot. There could be something hidden going on in your code that we can't see that might explain the problem you are having.
And your screenshot does not match Jeff's code. Compare your code to his again. "Basic math error" was a clue as to what you should be looking at.
11-27-2012 07:18 AM
For a more obvious hint, your multiply should be an add. But Ravens does have a point. There's no way the code you showed should give you the array you showed. First of all, the first row should be all 0s (first iteration, i=0, A*0=0). There is likely something hidden. Maybe a diagram cleanup is in order.
11-27-2012 07:59 AM
I think I got the solution 🙂
Below is my VI