I have a data type issue regarding calling. net assemblies

[rolfk]

---

@Freddy. wrote:
So the only feasible solution currently may be to write another DLL to pass the structure……

---

That is your conclusion! 😁

I have on occasion gone the path of passing the entire structure into individual parameters through the Call Library Node (and add conditional compile to do the other thing for 64-bit) but yes it is painful and if there is anything else about the API that gets difficult to impossible to handle through the Call Library Node (callback pointers for instance) I always resolve to an additional intermediate shared library.

[Freddy.]

My understanding is to split all parameters into one cluster? (I'm sorry, most of the time I use translation, so I don't quite understand some of the meaning.)

[Freddy.]

I split the elements in the cluster and imported them into the library function... Obviously, this is not correct. Labview still crashes, so how should I modify the cluster for this library function to function properly?

[rolfk · Accepted solution]

---

@Freddy. wrote:

I split the elements in the cluster and imported them into the library function... Obviously, this is not correct. Labview still crashes, so how should I modify the cluster for this library function to function properly?

---

That is not what I was explaining to be necessary for structures being passed by value.

This is a start of what needs to be done. Sorry for not doing all the nitty gritty work. 😀

 

[AnalogKid2DigitalMan]

Could either of these toolkits be an alternative option?

https://www.ni.com/en-us/support/downloads/tools-network/download.robotics-toolkit-for-yaskawa-motom...

https://www.vipm.io/package/imaginglab_gmbh_lib_yaskawa_robotics_library/

-AK2DM

[Freddy.]

Good morning, I immediately understood your code snippet! I have completed the remaining work. Well done, labview finally stopped crashing and I got the desired return code!

[Freddy.]

This is not a good choice, this third-party library is too expensive. I have already developed the encryption dog for the secondary development module of the robotic arm (the price is half of the robotic arm)