11-07-2018 03:00 PM
Thanks mcduff,
The reason I didn't use automatic logging is because I only want to log data for a certain length of time, and want to start logging that data whenever I choose. However I still want to see the data even if I'm not logging it.
With respect to the consumer loop, if it's behind my read loop by 5 seconds when I start my logging data timer, I'm worried that it will read data that's 5 seconds behind what the waveform chard in the read loop is showing. Or is my logic on how this would work flawed?
11-07-2018 03:14 PM
There is a pause logging feature available, see attached, if you want to go that route.
If your consumer loop is behind, then yes loops will not be synced. You can always display the acquisition time, T start, in your consumer loop to see how far behind it is.
mcduff
11-07-2018 03:30 PM
Thanks, that seems like a good route to go down.