LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

LV 20.01 f1 - anyone know anything about it?

Solved!
Go to solution

Apologies to revive an old thread.

 

I see that 2020 f1 is back and available for download again. The bug fix link has a list of corrections (https://www.ni.com/en-nz/support/documentation/bugs/20/labview-2020-bug-fixes.html).

 

Will trial this 'beta f' patch again.

0 Kudos
Message 21 of 29
(1,278 Views)

Should we tell NI that the bug list needs to be updated with the 20f2 fixes?

 

It seems they simply forgot?

0 Kudos
Message 22 of 29
(1,262 Views)

wiebe@CARYA wrote:

Should we tell NI that the bug list needs to be updated with the 20f2 fixes?

 

It seems they simply forgot?


Should we tell them it's actually "f3"?

Bill
CLD
(Mid-Level minion.)
My support system ensures that I don't look totally incompetent.
Proud to say that I've progressed beyond knowing just enough to be dangerous. I now know enough to know that I have no clue about anything at all.
Humble author of the CLAD Nugget.
0 Kudos
Message 23 of 29
(1,249 Views)

wiebe@CARYA wrote:

Should we tell NI that the bug list needs to be updated with the 20f2 fixes?

 

It seems they simply forgot?


That's on the timeline to get fixed in f4.

Message 24 of 29
(1,229 Views)

@BertMcMahan wrote:

wiebe@CARYA wrote:

Should we tell NI that the bug list needs to be updated with the 20f2 fixes?

 

It seems they simply forgot?


That's on the timeline to get fixed in f4.


Nah.  SP1 is typically due out around November.



There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines
"Not that we are sufficient in ourselves to claim anything as coming from us, but our sufficiency is from God" - 2 Corinthians 3:5
Message 25 of 29
(1,216 Views)

@crossrulz wrote:

@BertMcMahan wrote:

wiebe@CARYA wrote:

Should we tell NI that the bug list needs to be updated with the 20f2 fixes?

 

It seems they simply forgot?


That's on the timeline to get fixed in f4.


Nah.  SP1 is typically due out around November.


They did feel the re-issue f1 (or is it really f3?), so you never know...

Bill
CLD
(Mid-Level minion.)
My support system ensures that I don't look totally incompetent.
Proud to say that I've progressed beyond knowing just enough to be dangerous. I now know enough to know that I have no clue about anything at all.
Humble author of the CLAD Nugget.
0 Kudos
Message 26 of 29
(1,212 Views)

Well this version seems just as bad as the last 'f2' / 'f1' (whatever) with constant MemoryManager crashes.

 

Starting to regret upgrading some legacy projects to 2020...

 

0 Kudos
Message 27 of 29
(1,197 Views)

@tyk007 wrote:

Well this version seems just as bad as the last 'f2' / 'f1' (whatever) with constant MemoryManager crashes.


The patched 'not saving new VIs from templates twice' (BUG 1057446) bug was the only showstopper. I don't recall any MemoryManager crash at all.

0 Kudos
Message 28 of 29
(1,177 Views)
Solution
Accepted by topic author billko

wiebe@CARYA wrote:

Should we tell NI that the bug list needs to be updated with the 20f2 fixes?

 

It seems they simply forgot?


Update on this...

 

As of November 4th, the bug list shows the only update was to correct the feed path for NIPM to get LabVIEW updates.  So it appears that LabVIEW itself was not changed.  So it showing "f1" actually makes sense.



There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines
"Not that we are sufficient in ourselves to claim anything as coming from us, but our sufficiency is from God" - 2 Corinthians 3:5
Message 29 of 29
(1,084 Views)