LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

LabVIEW 8.2 error log file: fpsane.cpp line 401

An error from fpsane means that something got broken in your VI. Report this to NI to get any hints what can cause the error. Normally this is an front panel object.
In the meantime you can start from an working backup changing the things step by step, making a copy for each step and test each step.
I guess you have to replace one more of your controls or indicators in the VI you are changing.
Waldemar

Using 7.1.1, 8.5.1, 8.6.1, 2009 on XP and RT
Don't forget to give Kudos to good answers and/or questions
Message 2 of 6
(7,377 Views)

Also see what Eric V (NI) says here:

http://forums.ni.com/ni/board/message?board.id=170&view=by_date_ascending&message.id=327527#M327527

QUOTE:

"A DWARN like the one you experienced means that something unexpected occurred in the LabVIEW program, but not necesarily something that is going to cause you problems.

Looking through our database, I found several bug reports (aka: Corrective Action Requests or CARs) filed with R&D about this error, but they all seem to correspond to LabVIEW 8.2.1 (ie: they are probably fixed in the latest version).

Do you have access to a newer version of LabVIEW that you could try?  If not, if you can tell me how to reproduce it in 8.2.1 I will try here and hopefully verify that it has been corrected in 8.5.

In any case, you probably don't need to worry about it if you haven't noticed any other problems."

Message 3 of 6
(7,363 Views)

I'm using LabVIEW 8.6 I got the same error by mass compiling 2 projects that used common code between them. The older project I had named as a "donor" project and set it aside for canabalising. The newer project I am rebuilding from the ground up using the new OOB features in 8.6 and the last few releases. I've been sucking strict type def'd functions into class structures. At the end of the day, things were runnig slow, so since the "donor" code was written in 8.5.1, I ran a mass compile on that library and then on the newer project. Reading the lvlog report I see this:

 

  *** Dumping Bread Crumb Stack ***
#** sanity checking heap: "N:\ATEST\Automation\PAT_2.0\Working_Source\PAT_Ver2\Matrix left divisionMM_general_direct.vi"
#** sanity checking: "N:\ATEST\Automation\PAT_2.0\Working_Source\PAT_Ver2\Matrix left divisionMM_general_direct.vi"
#** compile: "N:\ATEST\Automation\PAT_2.0\Working_Source\PAT_Ver2\Matrix left divisionMM_general_direct.vi"
*** End Dump ***
Insane object at BDHP+C77BB9C, UID 1089, in "NI_Gmath.lvlib:Matrix left divisionMM_general_direct.vi": {flags } (0x1000): Call Library Function Node (NODE)

c:\builds\penguin\labview\branches\Saturn\dev\source\panel\fpsane.cpp(434) : DWarn: Insanities(0x00001000) exist in ReportInsanities, 'NI_Gmath.lvlib:Matrix left divisionMM_general_direct.vi'
$Id: //labview/branches/Saturn/dev/source/panel/fpsane.cpp#10 $

 

 So I don't know if this is a continuation of the fpsane.cpp  line 401 problem or not. But this is the page I was directed to when I reported the problem.

0 Kudos
Message 4 of 6
(6,346 Views)

Hi Jamey,

 

It is actually a very diefferent problem all together. Your issue fpsane.cpp(434) is related to Lv 8.6 . Do you get a pop up dialog box that asks you if you want to report the problem to NI? If you do, it may be best to do this now and start a Service Request on the Issue. Also, is there a way you can post the whole lvlog? Can you repeat this warning in any way? Its possible if this error only occured once that this was just a warning and is of no threat to your code, however, any additional information that you could provide about how the error occured and what the error is saying would be very helpful to figuring exactly what caused it.

National Instruments
RIO Embedded Hardware PSE

CompactRIO Developers Guide
0 Kudos
Message 5 of 6
(6,321 Views)

oops my error. I made a couple fast clicks on links and things and didn't really look hard enough at the error codes. I'll see if I can start a new thread.

 

Jamey

0 Kudos
Message 6 of 6
(6,316 Views)