02-06-2006 10:32 AM
Hi,
I have upgraded a software to LabVIEW 8 last week and I found that LV8 is very slow to edit Block Diagram of a large VI. (2Mb VI's).
When i create a wire it take 3 sec to apper, it's the same thing by dropping a VI or a structure. This behaviour makes LV8 unworkable.
This behaviour is not present in LabVIEW7.1 ... For example a VI file in LabVIEW 7.1 of 7Mb is very fast to edit, and when I convert the VI to LabVIEW 8 the file is reduced to 2Mb and very slow to edit. I imagine that the compiler was optimised to get smaller VI files, but that create a delay while editing the VI's by compiling each time that something new is dropped to the diagram.
Is there a way to optimize the speed for editing a Large VI's?
I don’t want to split those Big VI to smaller parts... I don’t have the time and the budget to do so.
Now I am thinking to downgrade to LV7.1 to be more productive...
Thanks
Dany
02-06-2006 10:57 AM
02-06-2006 12:32 PM
02-06-2006 01:01 PM
HI,
I have no problem with my PC : 2.5 GHz 1.2G of RAM 12G of available space on disk... we got the same behaviour on 4 differant PCs for Big VI...
02-06-2006 05:09 PM
I can not offer any suggestions but I can ask questions.
If you go to the diagram and copy everything and paste it into a new VI, does the new VI edit faster? (attribrution: This wild guess was inspired by a posting from C. Altenbach in a private forum).
Ben
02-06-2006 09:33 PM
02-07-2006 09:04 AM
02-07-2006 09:15 AM
Hi Dany,
If you get the oppertunity, could you let us know what you find out in the end?
It may help us help others in the future.
Ben
02-07-2006 11:55 AM
02-22-2006 05:36 PM
There is the last reply from NI i got to this issue
<QUOTE>
Hey Dany,
Just wanted to check in with you again before the service request closes up
to see if you have any other questions. We did find out that the inner case
structure seems to be causing the problem. You haven't done anything wrong
nor can you really do anything to improve your code. There just seems to be
a bug and R&D is going to look into the problem. Let me know if you have
further questions. Thanks!
</QUOTE>
It's a bug...
Dany