LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Labview, Laminar flow, and Traffic Theory

It never ceases to amaze me how many different disciplines Labview users come from.  One reason I enjoy being on this forum so much, is that I get to work with a staggering variety of hardware, software, and scientific fields.  One can't do this for very long without learning how to think outside the box, when to know if it's a Labview problem, and when to know if there's "gasp!" a better solution.
    A while back, I read an article in Scientific American...I forgot the exact title....but the gist of it was "Why widening roads doesn't work."  It was a very comprehensive treatment of traffic flow theory, which is applicable to a multitude of disciplines, including software design.  We've all experienced the phenomenon where major highway renovation takes place...perhaps doubling or tripling the number of lanes in a certain section of road,  and immediately noticing that there is no abatement of traffic whatsoever.  In this particular S.A. article, they showed that the capacity of traffic WOULD increase in direct proportion to the number of lanes, IF and ONLY IF, you allowed no lane changing!  The "no lane changing" mode of traffic is known as LAMINAR FLOW.   Of course, there are huge socilological problems involved in this,as well.  Americans like changing lanes a lot, and as long as they do, widening roads will not fix traffic problems.  In some cases, it can make things worse.  But, if we could somehow create laminar flow traffic patterns, life would be more blissful.
   Now, vehicular  traffic  on roads isn't  the only place where Laminar Flow works.   Engineers have learned how to create laminar flow water in pipes which exhibits FAR less viscosity than turbulent water.  Actually, it's not very hard to create laminar water flow...you just need a short section of pipe with a lot of tiny tubes in it...keepng water molecules in their "lanes" as it were.  Oddly enough, once you create laminar water flow, it tends to STAY laminar even if it passes through a normal hose.  Some astonishing water fountains have been made this way...beautiful parbolic arcs of water can enter a pond without creating a hint of a splash or ripple.  You can't even tell the water is moving.
    Well, what does this all have to do with Labview?   I have noticed a trend over the years some HUGE Labview applications, containing many simulatenous loops, etc.  In my own experience, I have worked on distributed DataSocket applications with HUNDREDS of simultaneous sockets running....over a relatively limited bandwidth.  The trend can only continue, as Labview is applied to bigger and diverse  systems.  A thorough understanding of some traffic flow principles can go a long way toward streamlining large Labview applications. If we think LAMINAR FLOW when we design process control, we have one more tool for streamlining our applications.  We should design our large applications so that there is a minimum of unnecessary signalling between looops ("crosstalk"), which is the equivalent of lane changing.  We need to manage our memory well....explicit memory allocation is the logical equivalent of laminar flow.  Dynamic memory allocation is, of course, the trend, but it is NOT where you want to go, if raw performance is the goal!
    Anyway, I hope this little diatribe has perhaps stimulated some thought.  I'd love you hear your thoughts on traffic theory, laminar flow, and anything else related.  (or unrelated!)

  Eric
  


Eric P. Nichols
P.O. Box 56235
North Pole, AK 99705
Message 1 of 4
(3,906 Views)
Eric,

Great post. Do you have any links that could provide some more information?

p.s. Just noticed your signature. Several years ago I spent a couple of summers working near Fairbanks. Can't say I miss the mosquitoes but other than that, I really enjoyed myself up in your neck of the woods.
0 Kudos
Message 2 of 4
(3,880 Views)
Thanks, Dennis.

    Well, in September, I will have been in Fairbanks 30 years. Mosquitoes are a small price to pay for not having to deal too much with traffic flow. 🙂  (
See attached article)  I worked for UCLA's HIPAS observatory for almost 10 years, (I still keep tabs on the latest activities there).  HIPAS does ionospheric research with high powered radio waves, generating ELF by interaction with the Aurora, etc.  It was there that I cut my teeth on Labview.  Now I'm working as a contractor at Eielson Air Force Base....a much more prosaic career, but a lot more stable than basic research.  Alas, it seems it is nigh unto impossible to make a living in basic reseach these days.  Corporate thinking is so short sighted ....they want quarterly profit reports, and basic research can take DECADES before you have a marketable product...if EVER.  I think the days of Bell Labs and the like are behind us...armies of people doing research just for the sake of research.  I'm not sure the best science comes about by working on a "problem."  It comes about by sheer curiosity.
Which reminds me....I have an article coming out in the next edition of QEX magazine, which is dedicated to amateur radio experimentation.  It's called "What's your CQ: Curiosity Quotient."  I address this very issue.
Anyway, I shall dismount my soap box.   By the way, there is a pretty good article in Encyclopedia on traffic flow theory, as well as one on network theory, both rather intertwined.. 

Eric

Eric P. Nichols
P.O. Box 56235
North Pole, AK 99705
Message 3 of 4
(3,870 Views)
I meant Encyclopedia Britannica. 🙂


Eric P. Nichols
P.O. Box 56235
North Pole, AK 99705
0 Kudos
Message 4 of 4
(3,854 Views)