06-04-2024 12:53 PM
@altenbach wrote:
@paul_a_cardinale wrote:
I don't understand the concept of a "1D Waveform".
It is a 1D array of waveforms.
I believe, Paul's intention is that if there are N waveforms with same dt and same t0, it doesn't make sense to have them a N waveforms instead 1 waveform with N+ channels.
1D or higher dimensional waveforms are typically for better management/identification of waveform source/functionality.
06-04-2024 01:54 PM
@santo_13 wrote:
I believe, Paul's intention is that if there are N waveforms with same dt and same t0, it doesn't make sense to have them a N waveforms instead 1 waveform with N+ channels.
Obviously, you know more than me here, but I always thought that the Y component of a waveform is always a 1D array. (We are not talking about dynamic data, right?)
Compare that to the legacy, pre-waveform [xo, dx, [Y]] cluster that can have 1D or 2D arrays for Y:
So how exactly are you defining a single waveform with N channels without using an array of waveforms?
06-04-2024 03:15 PM
My intention was to be lexically nit-picky. A waveform necessarily occupies at least 2 dimensions. There's no such thing as a "1D Waveform".