02-26-2010 09:52 AM
I suspect the that using a control with default values is much faster than a constant. I have an interesting demo here http://forums.ni.com/ni/board/message?board.id=170&thread.id=427778&view=by_date_descending&page=2
02-26-2010 10:13 AM
Coq Rouge wrote:I suspect the that using a control with default values is much faster than a constant. I have an interesting demo here http://forums.ni.com/ni/board/message?board.id=170&thread.id=427778&view=by_date_descending&page=2
I am not convinced (yet). I updated that thread with a modified benchamark to illustrate.
Ben
02-26-2010 10:41 AM
Running the same example as I pointed to in Labview 9 gives almost identical times. But at that time I did not have access to Labview 9. So my statement is not valid in Labview 9
Ben wrote:I am not convinced (yet). I updated that thread with a modified benchamark to illustrate.
Ben
02-26-2010 11:04 AM
HI Coq,
The way your benchmark code was laid out gave some odd results becuase more than one thing was running at a time so they were fighting with each other so the numbers can't be trusted. If you go back to the thread you linked you will see an image of how I modified the ocde such that the benchmarks is actually measuring the speed of teh transpose isntead how quickly and often does it switch threads and competition with the GUI updates.
Ben