LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Micro-Nuggets !!! ~~~~ Post 'em if you got 'em

I'm not sure I like this because of the use of Knight which can mean something else.  And Overlord implies I use globals, but still I like having a scale from Peasant to Overlord.

 

 Hooovahh Class System.png

0 Kudos
Message 271 of 368
(1,746 Views)

@Hooovahh wrote:

I'm not sure I like this because of the use of Knight which can mean something else.  And Overlord implies I use globals, but still I like having a scale from Peasant to Overlord.

 

 Hooovahh Class System.png


LOL that fits me perfectly.  😄

Bill
CLD
(Mid-Level minion.)
My support system ensures that I don't look totally incompetent.
Proud to say that I've progressed beyond knowing just enough to be dangerous. I now know enough to know that I have no clue about anything at all.
Humble author of the CLAD Nugget.
0 Kudos
Message 272 of 368
(1,718 Views)

@Hooovahh wrote:

I'm not sure I like this because of the use of Knight which can mean something else.  And Overlord implies I use globals, but still I like having a scale from Peasant to Overlord.


Slave?  Plebeian?  Priest?  Prince? Squire?  I'm sure we can come up with some other good names.


GCentral
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines
"Not that we are sufficient in ourselves to claim anything as coming from us, but our sufficiency is from God" - 2 Corinthians 3:5
0 Kudos
Message 273 of 368
(1,704 Views)
Well i couldn't think of any other ones at the time.
0 Kudos
Message 274 of 368
(1,701 Views)

@Hooovahh wrote:
Well i couldn't think of any other ones at the time.

That's why I'm helping you brainstorm.


GCentral
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines
"Not that we are sufficient in ourselves to claim anything as coming from us, but our sufficiency is from God" - 2 Corinthians 3:5
0 Kudos
Message 275 of 368
(1,692 Views)

@crossrulz wrote:

Slave?  Plebeian?  Priest?  Prince? Squire?  I'm sure we can come up with some other good names.


lv_guru.png

Message 276 of 368
(1,603 Views)

@PhillipBrooks

 

This one I agree with for the most part.  I mean with these images we have no clue how these functions are actually being used for, but would a CLAD actually use a queue to set a value?  And the CPI would most certainly teach to the students level, and in that case global maybe mentioned.  Looking back on the LabVIEW course I tought I never had native globals in an assignment.  I talked about them and demonstrated them, but made it clear how a functional global had more flexibility and is generally prefered.

0 Kudos
Message 277 of 368
(1,572 Views)

I agree, as a CLAD I currently abuse queues for trans-VI data exchange. 😉

And I actually use boolean queues quite often.

 

That being said, I ought to get back to sample tests, recert's tomorrow! 😉

0 Kudos
Message 278 of 368
(1,567 Views)

When ever I find my self using a boolean queue I try to think if a Semaphore or Occurrence can do my task for me.  If I started with a boolean and expect the type to change then that's a reason to stay with a queue.  In most other cases I realize other message strategies are simpler.

0 Kudos
Message 279 of 368
(1,561 Views)

Aren't occurrences deprecated in favor of notifiers?

 

And I did consider other options and found queues the best way - I am essentially transporting binary data, not "flags".

0 Kudos
Message 280 of 368
(1,551 Views)