My EXE takes about 8 times longer to run then the LLB from which it was compiled.

[CAS]

I am running V5.0.1. I have tried the Control-Shift-Run arrow suggested in another discussion without any improvement. The code is sorting through a large array of data in a loop using shift registers.

[Greg_McKaskle2]

> I am running V5.0.1. I have tried the Control-Shift-Run arrow
> suggested in another discussion without any improvement. The code is
> sorting through a large array of data in a loop using shift registers.


I'm just making a guess here, but the setting of anxious memory
deallocation could be responsible for such a difference. If this isn't
the difference, you might compare the other ini settings and either
experiment with changed settings, or list the differences here so that
we can comment on the differences.

Greg McKaskle

[CAS]

Are you referring to the 'Deallocate memory as soon as possible' option? If so this is unchecked. Other performance settings are:
'use default timer' - unchecked
'check available disk space during launch' - checked
'run with multiple threads' - checked
I have not changed any of these when producing the EXE. I've had a go at unchecking the 'run with multiple threads' option which made no difference.

Any more ideas or useful information I could supply?