05-03-2023 02:02 PM
My suspicion is that the OP is using "call by reference" with entered paths as shown in the Earlier post . Pure madness!
05-03-2023 02:15 PM
@altenbach wrote:
My suspicion is that the OP is using "call by reference" with entered paths as shown in the Earlier post . Pure madness!
😯
05-04-2023 02:00 AM
I agree with the others. If your goal is to have the path in your code for some reason, it's almost certainly better to have a static reference to the VI and connect that to a property node to read the path. Using just the path is problematic for any number of reasons (forward compatibility and inclusion in executables, to name just a couple that come to mind).
If you tell us what you actually want to do, we could probably offer better advice.