I'm trying to "leverage" the enhanced TCP/IP and Shared Variable properties of LabView 8.5. My application involves (among other things) doing continuous sampling (16 channels, 1KHz/channel) using 6-year-old PXIs (Pentium III) and streaming data to the host. I developed a small test routine that was more than capable of handling this data rate, even when I had the host put a 20msec wait between attending to the PXI (to simulate other processing on the host). To do this, I enabled the "RT FIFO" property of the Shared Variable (which was an array of 16 I16 integers) and specified a buffer size of 50 (that's 50 arrays). Key to making this work was figuring out the "error codes" associated with the SV RT FIFO, particularly the one that says the FIFO is empty (so don't save the "non-data" that is present).
Flush with success, I started developing a more realistic routine that involves rather more traffic between Host and Remote, including the passing back and forth of "event" data. These include, among other things, "state variables" to enable both host and remote to run state machines that stay "in sync"; in addition, the PXI also acquires digital data (button pushes, etc.) which are other "events" to be sent to the Host and streamed to disk. I developed the dual state-machine model without including the "analog data" machine, just to get the design of the Host/Remote system down and deal with exchanging digital data through other Shared Variables. Along the way, I decided to make these also use an RT FIFO, as I didn't want to "miss" any data. One problem I had noticed when using Shared Variables is the difficulty of telling "is this new?", i.e. is the variable present one that has been already read (and processed) or something that needs processing. I ended up adopting something of a kludge for the events by including an incrementing "event ID" that could be tested to see if it was "new".
Today, I put the two routines together by adding the "generate 16-channels of integer data at 1 KHz and send it to the Host via the Shared Variable" code to my existing Host/Remote state machine. I used exactly the same logic I'd previously employed to monitor the RT FIFO associated with this Shared Variable (basically, the Host reads the SV, then looks at the error code -- a value of -2220 means "Shared Variable FIFO Read Buffer Empty", so the value you just read is an "old" value, so throw it away). Very sad -- my code threw EVERYTHING away! No matter how slowly the Host ran, the indicator always said that the Shared Variable FIFO Read Buffer was empty! This wasn't true -- if I ignored the flag, and saved anyway, I saw reasonable-looking data (I was generating a sinusoid, and I saw numbers going up and down). The trouble was that I read many more points than were actually generated, since I read the same values multiple times!
Looking at the code, the error line coming into the Shared Variable (before it was read) was -2220, and it remained so after it was read. How could this be? One possibility is that my other Shared Variables were mucking up the error line, but I would have thought that the SV Engine handling reading my "analog data" SV would have set the error line appropriately for my variable. On a hunch, I turned of the RT FIFO on the two Event shared variables, and wouldn't you know, this more-or-less fixed it!
But why? What is the point of having a shared variable "attached" to an error line and having it return "Shared Variable FIFO Read Buffer Empty" if it doesn't apply to its own Read Buffer? This seems to me to be a very serious bug that renders this extremely useful feature almost worthless (certainly mega-frustrating). The beauty of the new Shared Variable structure and the new code in Version 8.5 is that it does seem to allow better and faster communication in real-time using TCP/IP, so we can devote the PXI to "real-time" chores (data acquisition, perhaps stimulus generation) and let the PC handle data streaming, displays, controls, etc.
Has anyone been successful in developing a data-streaming application using shared variables between a PXI and and PC, particularly one with multiple real-time streams (such as mine, where I have an analog stream from the PXI at 16 * 1KHz, a digital stream from the PXI at irregular intervalus, but possibly up to 300 Hz, and "control" information going between PC and PXI to keep them in step)? Note that I'm attempting to "modernize" some Version 7 code that (in the absence of a good communication mechanism) is something of a nightmare, with data being kept in PXI memory, written on occasion to the PXI hard drive (!), and then eventually being written up to the PC; in addition, because the data "stayed" on the PXI, we split the signal and ran a second A/D board in the PC just so we could "see" the signal and create a display. How much better to get the PXI to send the data to the PC, which can sock it away and take samples from the data stream to display as they fly by on their way to the hard drive!
But I need to get Shared Variables (or something similar) working more "understandably" first ...
Bob Schor
