Problem with consumer/producer loop.

[chuck72352]

I changed the error shift register as suggested to a tunnel and it didn't seem to make a difference.

[CoastalMaineBird]

I changed the error shift register as suggested to a tunnel and it didn't seem to make a difference.

OK, did you look at the contents of the error line?

Are you having an error, or not?

Create an indicator, or put a probe on the wire, to answer that. 

[chuck72352]

I'm not getting an error. (See 6.vi)

[CoastalMaineBird]

OK, so follow the steps I described - is the NEXT STATE thing showing what you expect?

[chuck72352]

It is not showing what I expect. It is showing "Start BurnIn" and I expect it to be showing TimeCheck.

[CoastalMaineBird]

OK, keep chasing it backwards.  If it's not coming out, is it in fact going IN TO the queue?

Consider what you're doing - you are DE_QEUEUEing an element, and then you immediately FLUSH THE QUEUE.

Why is that?  That means your queue can never hold more than one element, which sort of defeats the purpose of the queue.

[JÞB]

Send a snap-shot if the VI heirachy with type-defs.  I'm thinking if the value in the cluster isnt what you expect-its being coerced from a divergent teyp-def

[chuck72352]

I've attached the VI Hierarchy.

[CoastalMaineBird]

That's possible, Jeff, but flushing the queue is a great big pothole into which could fall the missing cluster.