LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Program lost part of functions after 1.5 month?

Jeff,

 

I cannot follow the link you put here for the "if you really want to dig under the hood there is a good discussion about DAQmx state transitions" - it took me to reply my own message? Can you put it again? Thanks

 

Harry

0 Kudos
Message 51 of 53
(502 Views)

Tag DAQmx_States


"Should be" isn't "Is" -Jay
Message 52 of 53
(489 Views)

Jeff,

 

One more quick question. You mentioned this "undocumented behavior" is related to N sample DAQ. What if I read only ONE sample at Analog input every cycle, am I safe with this bug?

 

If that's the case, then I do not have to make any code change, like including those new code in the program, correct?

 

Thanks

 

Rgds,

 

Harry

0 Kudos
Message 53 of 53
(469 Views)