Review my ATM CLD practice paper?

[Lewis_G]

Hey guys,

I have my CLD exam booked for early November and did a practice paper today.  I was hoping somebody could take a look at my code and offer some constructive criticism?

It took the whole 4 hours and I would like to think it is a pass.  I am worried there is not enough documentation.

What you think? 

[Pete.Dunc]

Hey Lewis,

This looks good!  There is a certification board this might get more traction on.

Some tips that helped me:

- Add a description and tip to all front panel objects (this was the first thing I did in my exam)

- Document everything - labels on all block diagrams, VI description for all VIs (including the main VI)

- Don't use non-default type-defined cluster constants (use default combined with Bundle By Name) - you will drop marks for this.

Overall this is a good effort.  Get the documentation in, it's free marks 

Come and say hello when you're sitting it!

[Lewis_G]

Cheers Pete,

The feedback is great thanks.  I will do more documentation on the next run and I will directly bundle the control references in the future too.  I think I made a typedef because I was worried the name/labels would get lost.

I will post my next one up on the certification board too.

I'll be sure to drop in and say hello when I come down.

Thanks again,

Lewis