11-01-2013 02:40 PM
Although Jeffs idea works, i'd say it's easier to have the main vi reset itself after the sub-vi call, it's easily done if you control program flow through error wires.
/Y
11-01-2013 02:42 PM
@JÞB wrote:
Jordan - could you possibly replace the attachment in my previous post with the correct attachment in this one? If we can't, the link from the community site will just confuse the bejeebbers out of everyone. My idiocy shouldn't ruin everyones day- just yours and mine
Done!
11-01-2013 02:48 PM
@Yamaeda wrote:
Although Jeffs idea works, i'd say it's easier to have the main vi reset itself after the sub-vi call, it's easily done if you control program flow through error wires.
/Y
Leaving it up to the "Plug-in" lets different plug-ins do different things to the caller. Since its all done through VI Server either way, I suggested this manner that lets any "GUI" call the heavy lifter. Either approach is workable. The choice of implementation belongs, quite rightly, with the developer since only they know the system requirements.
Well, HOPEFULLY, they have a pretty good idea of what they need to do. That's not always the case though
11-01-2013 02:50 PM
11-01-2013 03:27 PM
Thanks Jeff.