System Exec.vi Block Diagram Password

[paul_cardinale]

---

@Darren wrote:

Yup, this VI is definitely violating more than one of our style guidelines. Check out how honest I was in posting that picture without habitually cleaning up the diagram first? 😉

And yes, for performance reasons, those terminals should definitely be on the top-level diagram. But I'm hoping there's not too many instances of people calling System Exec.vi in a tight loop...

If I were still in R&D I would have already submitted the cleaned-up VI.

---

Does is really affect performance if the terminals are not in loops?

[Darren]

---

@paul_cardinale wrote:

---

---

Does is really affect performance if the terminals are not in loops?

---

Yes, there are compiler optimizations associated with subVI calls that cannot be realized if the subVI control/indicator terminals do not reside on the subVI's top-level diagram.

[altenbach]

---

@paul_cardinale wrote:
Does is really affect performance if the terminals are not in loops?

---

Some old discussions.