01-20-2025 11:37 AM
oh okay thank you if I get what you are saying you cant physical measure but you can mathematically deduce the answer. Can you further explain that for me please
01-20-2025 11:40 AM
I have also notice the keysight daq 970 allows for a reference channel for voltafge measurements will this help me in finding the difference with respect to ground
01-20-2025 11:47 AM
@kkofori wrote:
oh okay thank you if I get what you are saying you cant physical measure but you can mathematically deduce the answer. Can you further explain that for me please
When you need to know the difference between two voltage measurements, you measure both voltages and subtract them to find the difference.
01-20-2025 11:56 AM
that is what I do right now I measure V1 and V2 at both thermocouple points and subtract but that does not give me the right answer . I have used a a material with a known voltage to validate do this. So my seebeck coefficient set up gives me the accurate temperature but voltage is totally , i have learned that subtacting generated voltage at the ends of the thermocouples does not give we the actual potential difference between those two points
01-20-2025 11:58 AM
whenever I use my seebeck coefficient setup to test materials I keep getting the exact seebeck coefficient of constantin which is the material of the K type thermocouple
01-20-2025 12:02 PM
@kkofori wrote:
that is what I do right now I measure V1 and V2 at both thermocouple points and subtract but that does not give me the right answer . I have used a a material with a known voltage to validate do this. So my seebeck coefficient set up gives me the accurate temperature but voltage is totally , i have learned that subtacting generated voltage at the ends of the thermocouples does not give we the actual potential difference between those two points
We have been over this you can't do what you want to do the way you are doing it.
The two thermocouples are NOT going to give you the voltage on the device.