LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

UNABLE TO READ DATE FORMAT(DD/MM/YY) FROM EXCEL

Actually, the discrepancy lies with the fact that Excel thinks 1900 is a leap year. (!)

 

https://support.microsoft.com/en-ca/help/214326/excel-incorrectly-assumes-that-the-year-1900-is-a-le...

 

Excel '61' in date format is 3/1/1900 -> LabVIEW converts it to March 1 1900

Excel '60' in date format is 2/29/1900 -> LabVIEW converts it to Feb 28 1900

Excel '1' in date format is 1/1/1900 -> LabVIEW converts it to Dec 31 1899

 

I learned something today!

0 Kudos
Message 21 of 23
(1,203 Views)

Yes it does!

 

I didn't reread this particular thread to verify the accuracy of what was posted.  (I see that the poster was messing around with a "fudge factor" for some ridiculous reason.

 

There are other threads in the forum dealing with LabVIEW/Excel date/time conversions that are better.  Here is one such message. https://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/Labview-Drivers-for-Wireless-Sensor-Networks/m-p/858261#M389006

0 Kudos
Message 22 of 23
(1,199 Views)

There is also this to remember: (From a post on converting LabVIEW timestamp to Excel)

 

The OLE date format Excel uses is a double-precision floating point number that counts the time from 30 December 1899 00:00:00. Thus, a value of 0.0 corresponds to 30 December 1899 00:00:00.

 

The UTC date that is returned from the LabVIEW functions is the number of seconds elapsed since 12:00 a.m., Friday, January 1, 1904. Thus, in this case, a value of 0.0 corresponds to 01 January 1904 00:00:00.

 

This means you have an offset between a LabVIEW timestamp and the OLE date.

 

Basically, whatever date you get from LabVIEW you need to add the number of seconds between 30 December 1899 00:00:00 and 01 January 1904 00:00:00 to get the corresponding OLE date value (in floating point).

 

http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/UTC-time-to-OLE-date/td-p/729401?query.id=150077

========================
=== Engineer Ambiguously ===
========================
0 Kudos
Message 23 of 23
(1,188 Views)