09-22-2006 01:35 AM
09-22-2006 02:54 AM
" What's the thought process behind your rule-of thumb?"
well, i think all has been said...
cause i'm using lots of references (access is deeply nested inside the hierachy) i'm using a naming convention for controls that allows me to find the purpose of a control by its label. these labels are for sure not suitable for the common user of the app, so for the GUI i'm using the captions. i'm writing the code (and so the labels) in english while the GUI is in german (or any other language).
btw.: jwdz, has your question been answered?:-)
11-15-2006 08:14 PM
Hi Chilly, I looked at the 'race condition.vi' and I have a comment. Perhaps I'm a bit confused, but I don't think that's a demonstration of race conditions. I think that it is a demonstration of how/when locals are written to and read from. That code produces the same result every time, and it's just a bad way to code it, but I don't think it's a race condition.
@chilly charly wrote:- Open the diagram of the race condition.vi before running it and try to predict what will be the values of the two counters after the third run.
11-16-2006 03:41 AM
11-16-2006 07:29 AM
@shoneill wrote:
Who said race conditions need not be reproducible?
Shane,
No one.. 😉 That's why (certain) race conditions can / may cause unpredictable results. 😮
RayR
11-16-2006 09:21 AM
11-18-2006 12:32 PM
My response is based on this definition of a race condition:
@JoeLabView wrote:
@shoneill wrote:
Who said race conditions need not be reproducible?
Shane,
No one.. 😉 That's why (certain) race conditions can / may cause unpredictable results. 😮
RayR
11-18-2006 02:17 PM - edited 11-18-2006 02:17 PM
Hi -z,
I agree that CC example was predicable. Here is an other example that I believe is predicatably-unpredicable.
Ben
Message Edited by Ben on 11-18-2006 02:17 PM
11-19-2006 01:12 AM