LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Write to binary as reentrant VI


@FraggerFox wrote:

That would definately eat up the memory, and is not a good practice.

 


The attached shows the arrangement that I have so far. I will test the saving to binary part using the basic arrangement. 

 

Now that you mentioned the memory I'm alitle worried. What is the more accepted solution when talking to specific clones, 

 

Thanks 

 

Kas

0 Kudos
Message 21 of 22
(342 Views)

@zerotolerance wrote:

What is the more accepted solution when talking to specific clones, 

 


Again, I could not look into your example, I am using LV2010.

You can use action engines rather than creating queue for each clone spawned.

-FraggerFox!
Certified LabVIEW Architect, Certified TestStand Developer
"What you think today is what you live tomorrow"
0 Kudos
Message 22 of 22
(326 Views)