07-23-2009 11:25 PM
Hi,
I have done the response analysis using the previously posted example for the DUT i have got the result but i have one question regarding
that, i am posting the results could you pls check and tell me if those are supposed to be like that and also i get multiple values at one frequency how can i reduce it to one just check the attachment named untitled (the last attachment is a subvi to write and read data) thank you......
07-23-2009 11:45 PM
hi,
by mistake i have posted the same file two times here is the attachement where u can see the results
07-26-2009 10:56 PM
sk_labVIEW,
A few things.
1. The progressing changes in your Phase Difference are going to be because you are using an M Series card, like was mentioned in a previous post. The single ADC means channels are multiplexed at a fast rate and sent through one sample at a time. This results in virtual simultaneous sampling, but not true simultaneous, which is why you see the changing phase difference I believe.
2. The error that you recieved before mentioned something about samples being read before they are are written. I believe that this is occuring in your File VI. You will notice that you have no data dependcy between you write to spreadsheet file and your read from file, so it is possible, that LabVIEW is calling the read before anything is written. It is good programming practice typically to connect the error clusters to enforce programming flow. However, these express VIs don't seem to have error clusters so, while not as desirable, you can use a flat sequence structure, as seen in the attached screenshot, and hopefully this will prevent this error in the furture.
Was there anything else that you were asking about?
Regards,
Mallori
07-26-2009 11:15 PM
hi mallorim, thank you for the suggestion yes this was one of the issues i am facing and the other issue i have worked on it and i think i was
able to solve it if there is any other problem i will get back to you thanks again bye........
07-27-2009 12:13 AM
SK,
A lot of this was already answered in your other thread.
Please don't make new threads with the same problems. It just creates more work for the people trying to help you, and scatters the information all over the place.