multiple boolean values to be used in case structure

[JÞB]

---

sukanya wrote:
Yeah, I realized that when I changed the display pattern to "\" Codes display! There were some carriage returns, line feeds etc. Can't believe I wasted so much time on something this simple.

---

We've all done it once or twice.  Don't beat yourself up!

[Ben]

---

Jeff Bohrer wrote:

---

sukanya wrote:
Yeah, I realized that when I changed the display pattern to "\" Codes display! There were some carriage returns, line feeds etc. Can't believe I wasted so much time on something this simple.

---

We've all done it once or twice.  Don't beat yourself up!

---

Ditto that!

I had a trailing space in a folder spec that the DSC Historical trends VI did not complain about unitl I tried to read the trend. Then the reader and the Windows Explorer refuse to let me delete since trailing spaces are not allowed in folder names (then why did it create them!?!). The good news was we upgraded the PC so I did not have to reformat the dirves to get rid of those folders.

Ben

[PabloT]

and if the values aren't exclusive? Is there a...lets say cleaner or more professional way of developing it than the one commented before? (http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/how-to-find-valid-cases-in-truth-table/m-p/1017400?query.id=112270#M...

[Ricky_V.]

Hi Pablo,

Does the post you referenced give you a solution? What do you mean by cleaner? Which forum discussion is more relevant to your issue, the one you posted on, or the one you referenced?

Ricky

[DivChand]

Can you elaborate more on this. Because, I'm facing somewhat similar problem.

In the file I have attached, on the right side, the LabVIEW coding is correct. But, is there any other way to do it professionally. I want all the four case structure to be dependent on each other with respect to further errors

[altenbach]

This thread is 8 years old and I doubt the original authors are still monitoring it. It is also already marked as solved, robbing you of the opportunity to acknowledge a solution to your question, potentially lowering the probability of help.

You question makes no sense and your VI makes very little sense.

---

@DivChand wrote:

I want all the four case structure to be dependent on each other with respect to further errors

---

I have no idea what that even means. Dependent in what sense?

---

@DivChand wrote:

In the file I have attached, on the right side, the LabVIEW coding is correct. 

---

No, correct would be to use an array of booleans and a FOR loop, eliminating all the duplicate code and using a single property node with two elements. Even easier, show the plot visibility checkbox and none of this is even needed!

What problem are you trying to solve?