05-07-2011 12:34 PM
Attached.
Thank you.
05-07-2011 02:34 PM
You haven't changed The read delay. In FWB6010 Flux Query, right where I circled, you should have new delay constants. You should only be running this VI. Running your top level without fixing the subVI is just a waste of time.
05-07-2011 02:54 PM - edited 05-07-2011 02:59 PM
It seems that when we exit the code, it retains these constants (1000milisceond). I should have changed the default values. I started the code and I changed these values and saved them without exiting the code or the sub-VIs and the time delay was there.
Thank you for your help
05-07-2011 02:59 PM
Either change the VI I mentioned or change the front panel constants of the write and read functions.
Your debug may find out that the instrument requires a long delay.
05-07-2011 03:07 PM
I'll try this again on Monday.
Many thanks Dennis for your help.
05-07-2011 04:17 PM
@Dennis Knutson wrote:
Either change the VI I mentioned or change the front panel constants of the write and read functions.
Your debug may find out that the instrument requires a long delay.
The instrument can make the mesurements in less than 300mSec. Gosh, try to RTFM on the F. W. Bell website.
Sometimes it is not so easy to RTFM----- FWB could do better but, a STFW with "dedication" can show the info about FWB6010 speed of acquisition.
05-12-2011 04:14 AM
Hi Dennis,
It works!! As you suggested I changed the time delay in both FWB6110 and Kiethley to 500ms and 200ms. It seems that 500ms is better in terms of taking more points. 200ms is ok but the data points are about half of the data points when allowing more time delay.
Thank you very much indeed for your help.
05-12-2011 04:15 AM
Hi Jeff,
Thank you for the points you made.