02-25-2008 03:15 PM
02-27-2008 02:54 AM
02-27-2008 09:34 PM - edited 02-27-2008 09:37 PM
Hi Ryan,
The database is written remote and it is ~3.5 GB (365 days worth of data). The overall size does not change much as data gets overwritten regularly. For some time, I was actually running the archive every 15 minutes with no issues, except after reboot as discussed. The other day, when it crashed on a manual archive, it had opened touched 85 .cdib files, 19 .cdpg files. Looks like a total of 99 files have the "last" date/time stamp.
Ed
Just to be clear...
The Lookout database is local on the problem machine. The archive operation (Citadel control) is archiving the local database to a remote machine when the hang occurs. It works >90% of the time, just fine. Even the original 3.65 GB was done manually OK after a few tries.
02-27-2008 10:04 PM
02-27-2008 10:52 PM - edited 02-27-2008 10:56 PM
Yes, I need cabability to see back at least 3-months of historical (Hypertrend) data at times on the local server (live) database. I probably could cut it down, but I've always run with 365 days locally. The archive operation only writes the amount of data since the last archive operation (and deletes some too). On a system reboot, this should be less data actually, because the source database was not updating during the reboot.
Before I stopped the every 15-minute archives (to limit crashes altogether) the Citadel controls would run for less than 5 minutes at a time. So it wasn't necessarily caused by the sheer amount of data that was being updated. Although it may have had to do with how many file handles had to be opened i guess???
If Hypertrends could link to databases in addition to processes, this would ease my requirement significantly. Hypertrend is such a cool object, I can't live without it! If it could link to databases that were not running live lookout processes, that would be AWESOME!
This is another example I think of fixing Lookout so it shuts down smoothly on system request, such as monthly windows updates or remote administrative shutdown/restart without the -f force option.
Thanks for your help Ryan!
03-06-2008 12:35 AM
Ryan,
Any luck reproducing this?
Ed
09-02-2008 03:42 PM
Hi erblock!
I´d like to know if you were able to solve this, as I´m having the same problem in my server. If you could solve it, please tell me how you did.
Thanks
Luciano.