09-15-2009 12:07 PM
Hi Marty,
long, long time ago we used PC with firewire card, but not only for VBAI,but also for driving complete production line and also for acoustic test with one card from NI with 8 AMPs consumtion. We had very often frozen PC, HW problems and CVS was the solution. After replacement of firewire card and starting using the CVS i do not see problems like this. I do not know consumtion of CVS, but one industrial camera can have really around 5 Wats, I do not know how much during it's inicialization. I think, that when You buy one firewire hub to suply camera from hub and test it, it will not be worst then before and It is not so expensive. We use Belkin hub with 15 Wats power suply and we had 4 cameras on one hub with total consumption 14,5 Watt. It was running two Years w/o problems and now probably higher temperature, some amortisation of used components etc...I read that someone tried to change everything. Was there alsow powersuply for CVS changed? Cause when the conception in CVS is similar to PC there should be some wires nearly directly from PS to
firewire conector.
Jan
09-15-2009 01:18 PM
I do not have a separate power supply for the camera. It is powered from the power supply in the CVS. This is the power supply that NI had changed previously. The 6 pin firewire connector supplies power to the camera. The IEEE 1394 bus power is 18 watts max. This should not be a problem with only camera connected. If I connect the camera directly to my pc with an external power supply for the camera and run the inspection on my computer, I don't have any problems.
MartyP
09-16-2009 01:48 AM
We power CVS from external SIEMENS LOGO PS. Energy comming from FireWire connector depends on energy comming to CVS. If I do not have input to CVS strong enough to cover peaks of consumption of CVS and Camera, CVS has automatically priority 1 and rest of the world has temporary blackout. There can be lot of factors on the way. Temperature, connectors (resistance), age of equipment. Even it is not mechanically moving, each part has some lifetime and when it is older it has very probably higher consumption. When It is running 24 hours 251 working days in year with frequency 4 tests per minute I beleve, that something will be tired.
But for explanation, we made some improvement with more hubs, but on the base of theory of misscomunication. And it is working against my opinion that it will not work. Yesterday I was investigating, why my theory does not work fully, so I discovered pdf file with "specification" description of IMAQ and how does it works on the bus. And I discovered one important sentence:" If cameras are not detected by the host computer, it is an indication that there is not enough power provided to all of the cameras." and it is an explanation for my problem.
To tell the true I remember that we use hubs for one cameras at the begineing, but it was for PC card not for CVS.
Sometimes it is easier than it looks like, sometimes that way how to solve it, is to go from Your point of view on a blind way only to make You sure that it is really stupid. Motivation question: Are You really sure that it is not reason of Your problem? Did You ever tested that it really do not has an impact?
Nice day
Jan
02-15-2010 12:59 PM
Hello MartyP, discussion is dead, do you have still this issue, or not? I had it again, so we will manage special PS for each camera. Beacause of inactivity on forum I think someone solved it or my proposal was correct.
Hony
02-16-2010 02:58 PM
02-16-2010 04:39 PM
02-17-2010 06:43 AM
02-17-2010 06:49 AM
"VBAI when running on a CVS doesn't use the IMAQdx driver, it isn't even an option."
This is a good point, MartyP. I would like to know from NI why you can use it in MAX when the cameras are hooked to the CVS, but not in VBAI?
Some of my cameras work much better with the IMAQdx drivers (judging from watching how they perform on IMAQdx in MAX versus on the Legacy driver in MAX). Another odd thing, is when you watch it in MAX, it shows up on the monitor connected to the CVS unit. Seems like it must be simply be a limitation inside the VBAI application?
Mike
02-17-2010 10:24 AM
We were told that the IMAQdx driver used too much resources, whatever that means. It is confusing if you have your camera configured for the IMAQdx driver because it will show up in max as an imaging device on your CVS. This doesn't mean that it will work properly. I think the cameras that I have would work fine if I were running an inspection out of my computer using the IMAQdx driver. The camera firmware was designed to work with the IMAQdx driver. The drivers obviously perform differently although I have no idea to what extent.
I don't think NI has this documented anywhere. There was even some confusion at NI as to which driver was actually used.
Marty
02-17-2010 11:22 AM
Personally, I think the whole interrelationship between MAX and VBAI is very confusing when it comes to setting up the CVS. It seems like there is duplicated setup data and the functions are unclear. I've had situations, which I don't completely understand, where it seems that I've had to change settings in MAX to get things to work in VBAI.
In my opinion, it would be nice to leave MAX out altogether and put all the settings in one place inside VBAI. If nothing else, then better documentation about how to setup the CVS would be helpful. The whole process is extremely quirky and really turns off novice users around here on using the CVS. I'm a technical person and the process to me seems just short of voodoo...
Thanks,
Mike